Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Huffman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1967No. 199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of nonsuit was proper and must be sustained. If it be conceded the defendant was negligent in the manner in which she operated the Ford sedan, nevertheless, the plaintiff’s evidence shows his contributory negligence as a matter of law. He voluntarily sat on the fender, astride the radiator, of a moving automobile, with one foot on the bumper and the other under the elevated hood. He rode in that position 150 to 200 yards before the engine ignited, and 200 to 300 yards before he fell off and was injured. A clear case of contributory negligence is disclosed by the plaintiff’s own…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Presnell v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Tanner v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Peeler v. CruseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Blue v. CanelaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Presnell v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API