Legal Opinion

Blue v. Canela

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 2000No. COA99-1073PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

The superior court granted summary judgment to defendants Miguel Canela, Horace Vernon Pendergrass, Jr., and Camper Products, Inc. (collectively “defendants”), finding as a matter of law that: (1) plaintiffs contributory negligence was a proximate cause of the injuries alleged in her complaint; and (2) the doctrine of “last clear chance” does not apply. Virginia Blue (“plaintiff’) appeals. Upon review of the record before us, we reverse the trial court’s order, and remand the case for trial by jury.

The facts pertinent to this case are as follows. At about 2:00 p.m. on 29 July…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Nicholson v. American Safety Utility Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Holshouser v. Shaner Hotel Group Properties One Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Dobson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Thompson v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Deem v. Treadaway & Sons Painting & Wallcovering, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Price v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API