Seastream v. New Jersey Exhibition Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal of Griffiths and others, from a decree of the court of chancery, reported in 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 15.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Ci-iiee-Justice.
The appeal in the present case is from a decree in chancery adjudging the appellants guilty of contempt of that court in attempting to improperly influence the due administration of justice therein in the above-stated cause, and imposing upon each of them a fine of a specified amount.
Two reasons are assigned for reversing the decree—first, that the court of chancery was without jurisdiction to make it; and second, that it was not justified by the proofs submitted to the court.
The second ground cannot be availed of on appeal.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re CarubaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- State v. GussmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Zimmerman v. ZimmermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- In Re JibbNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- In Re HendricksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.