Legal Opinion

State v. McManus

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2007No. 82S00-0503-PD-78PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Having completed his direct appeal, Paul McManus sought post-conviction relief. The post-conviction court largely rejected his claims, except for his contention that he is mentally retarded. Persuaded by his retardation claim, the post-conviction court vacated the sentence of death and entered a sentence of life without parole. We direct judgment for the State.

*782Facts and Procedural History

In May 2002, a jury found Paul Mc-Manus guilty of murdering his wife and two daughters and recommended the death sentence. The trial court found that aggravating circumstances…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Paul M. McManus v. Ron NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Daniel Ray Wilkes v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Baer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API