Legal Opinion

Daniel Ray Wilkes v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2013No. 10S00-1004-PD-185PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Daniel Ray Wilkes, has appealed the post-conviction court’s denial of his claim that he was deprived of his constitutional rights to an impartial jury and effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the post-conviction court.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of the 2006 murders of Donna Claspell and her two daughters, eight-year-old Sydne Claspell and thirteen-year-old Avery Pike. 1 The State sought the death penalty and, in the penalty phase of the trial, the jury found all four charged statutory aggravating circumstances and that the aggravating…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Juan M. Garrett v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Angelo Bobadilla v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Jeffrey A. Weisheit v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. David Pannell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API