Daniel Ray Wilkes v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Chief Justice.
The defendant, Daniel Ray Wilkes, has appealed the post-conviction court’s denial of his claim that he was deprived of his constitutional rights to an impartial jury and effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the post-conviction court.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of the 2006 murders of Donna Claspell and her two daughters, eight-year-old Sydne Claspell and thirteen-year-old Avery Pike. 1 The State sought the death penalty and, in the penalty phase of the trial, the jury found all four charged statutory aggravating circumstances and that the aggravating…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Juan M. Garrett v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Angelo Bobadilla v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Jeffrey A. Weisheit v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- David Pannell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.