Legal Opinion

Vail v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1895No. Nos. 9501—(186)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the second defense in the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

As the administrator of the estate of J ane- Bray, deceased, plaintiff brought this action to recover $615.66, with interest, from defendants. The complaint alleged that in her lifetime the deceased had deposited, at various times and in small sums, this amount of money; that for a part of it certificates of deposit had been issued and delivered, payable to her order, on presentation thereof; and that the balance was to be paid over upon demand. A formal presentation of these certificates, and a demand on defendants for payment of the whole amount, was also alleged. By the answer, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Bogert v. FurmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Johnson's Adm'r v. LongmireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  4. Hannah's Ex'r v. Lankford's Adm'xSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Christe v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. McKeigue v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Cooper v. IvesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API