Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Verry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1928No. 26,632PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Plaintiff brought action to recover a sum of money from the defendant, C. R. Verry, and by garnishment impounded money in the hands of Lewis E. Jones. The interveners, Violette M. Verry, John E. Verry and Nellie M. Cross, claimed ownership of the money garnisheed and were brought in as claimants. Pleadings were made up, and the issue as to whether the money garnisheed was, at the time the garnishee summons was served, the property of defendant, C. R. Verry, or of said interveners, was duly tried in the district court. Plaintiff in the meantime had obtained judgment in the main action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farnham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Shuee v. ShueeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Granger v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Backdahl v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hardenbergh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Hardenbergh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. In Re Estate of ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API