Legal Opinion

Philip Meyers v. Frank D. Gillis, Superintendent the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania the District Attorney of Bucks County

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 23, 1996No. 95-1850PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting Philip Meyers habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Without determining whether the “presumption of correctness” found in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(8) had been overcome, the district court concluded, contrary to the state court’s *1148finding, that there was no factual basis developed prior to the entry of Meyers’ guilty plea. Concluding that the absence of an on-the-record factual basis violated Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 319, the district court granted habeas relief.

We…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. James H. Carpenter v. Donald T. Vaughn, Warden, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pa James Henry CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Holloway v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Holloway v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API