Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald J. Goldberg

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 16, 1995No. 94-7565PublishedCited by 214 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

We once again confront the tension caused when a criminal defendant appears to be manipulating his right to counsel in order to delay his trial. After relieving Ronald Goldberg’s court-appointed attorney, the district court refused his request for a continuance in order to retain private counsel. This forced Goldberg to stand trial without the assistance of counsel. The district court concluded that by his manipulative conduct, Goldberg had “waived” or, more properly, “forfeited” his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

The question before us is whether…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by214 opinions

  1. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Michael K. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Vincent R. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Thomas C. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API