Commonwealth v. Terry
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice MINTON.
The United States Supreme Court held more than thirty years ago that a criminal defendant could not be forced to accept representation by a state-appointed attorney so long as the defendant was “made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.” 1 Although later decisions have shown that trial courts need not use “magic words” or repeat a standardized litany before granting a defendant’s request for self-representation, 2 the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. William Stewart McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Hill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PedockieUtah Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lamb v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Grady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- King v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MartinKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Stanfill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.