Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Terry

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2009No. 2007-SC-000796-DGPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice MINTON.

The United States Supreme Court held more than thirty years ago that a criminal defendant could not be forced to accept representation by a state-appointed attorney so long as the defendant was “made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.” 1 Although later decisions have shown that trial courts need not use “magic words” or repeat a standardized litany before granting a defendant’s request for self-representation, 2 the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. William Stewart McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Hill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. PedockieUtah Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lamb v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Grady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. King v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Stanfill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API