Legal Opinion

Smith v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1912PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Eelton. Bibb superior court. May 1, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. In mutual benefit associations the contract of insurance is between the association and the member. The interest of a beneficiary in a certificate on the life of a member of such association is a mere expectancy, which becomes vested only on the death of the member. Therefore the member may change his beneficiary without other limitations or restrictions than such as are imposed by statute, the articles of incorporation, the by-laws, or the certificates of the association, where no equities exist in favor of the original beneficiary. 4 Cooley’s Briefs on Insurance, 3756, 3758; Niblack’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Brown v. DennisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Brown v. DennisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Mitchell v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Garabrant v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Dell v. VarnedoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API