Legal Opinion

Skorepa v. City of Chula Vista

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 6, 1989No. 88-0464-R(M)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RHOADES, District Judge.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the captioned case came before the Honorable John S. Rhoades, on April 17, 1989. Patricia A. Meyer, of Aguirre & Meyer, appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs and John E. McDermott, of McDermott, Will & Emery, appeared on behalf of the defendants. Based on the Court’s oral statements from the bench, the motion for summary judgment is granted. This order summarizes the basis for the Court’s ruling.

I.INTRODUCTION

This case concerns the City of Chula Vista’s at-large system for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garza v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Hastert v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. Magnolia Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
  4. Rural West Tennessee African-American Affairs Council, Inc. v. McWherterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
  5. Garza v. County of Los Angeles, Cal.District Court, C.D. California · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API