Legal Opinion

Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

We granted reargument of Acme Corrugated Box Co., Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 131 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 244, 570 A.2d 96 (1989) (Acme I) solely to consider whether a striking employee is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits after an employer refuses an unconditional offer to return to work under the terms of the expired contract because the job has been filled by a permanent replacement employee.

Prior to the expiration of an existing labor agreement, Acme Corrugated Box Co., Inc. (Acme) and the United Paper Workers’ Union, Local No. 375 (Union)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pramco, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Canonsburg General Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. T.B. Wood's Sons Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Bruce Plastics, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Silo, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Snap-Tite, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API