Legal Opinion

Bruce Plastics, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The question before this Court is whether the conditional offer to return to work by Patricia R. Auten and Láveme T. Pivirotto (representative Claimants), allows them to receive unemployment compensation benefits.

On February 9, 1990, BPI Acquisition Corp. (BPI) purchased the assets of Bruce Plastics, Inc. (Bruce). Bruce had been unionized for decades and at the time of the acquisition the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (Union) was the certified representative of the Bruce employees. BPI offered employment to all of Bruce’s employees and extended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. T.B. Wood's Sons Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canonsburg General Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Bruce Plastics, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Canonsburg General Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Canonsburg Hosp. v. Unemp. Comp. Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API