Legal Opinion
Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided February 2, 1967PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLCOTT, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal in an action brought by Walter Farrell charging breach of contract against Hessler, Inc. Hessler appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment. In an appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment by a defendant, in determining whether or not an issue of material fact exists, we accept the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Engle v. Poland, 8 Terry 365, 91 A.2d 326; Wilkes v. Melice, 9 Terry 206, 100 A.2d 742.
Briefly, those facts are that Farrell was employed by Hessler for some 40 years in a responsible capacity…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Chrysler Corp. v. QuimbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Wilmington Country Club v. Delaware Liquor CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Mulco Products, Inc. v. BlackSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23942h Frank C. Schoonejongen Wesley L. Losson John S. Dunning William Martone William v. Hanzalek Edward F. Ziek Melvin Deblock Joseph Colquhoun Joseph Majerscak Gerard Abbamont and Olga Wolsey, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Ruggiero v. FUTURAGENE, PLC.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
- Schoonejongen v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Colt Lanes of Dover, Inc. v. Brunswick CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.