Legal Opinion

State v. Rickman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1994PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

We granted this appeal to determine whether Tennessee should adopt a “sex crimes” exception to the general rule that evidence of other crimes is not admissible in a criminal prosecution. We conclude that Tennessee should not recognize a “sex crimes” exception to the general rule, but that it has recognized a narrow special rule which admits prior sex crimes into evidence if they are included in the indictment. Because the evidence of prior sex crimes admitted here was not included in the indictment and was wholly independent from the sex crime for which the defendant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. PartonTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. State v. DolinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. ThackerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RodriguezTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API