State v. Rickman
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine whether Tennessee should adopt a “sex crimes” exception to the general rule that evidence of other crimes is not admissible in a criminal prosecution. We conclude that Tennessee should not recognize a “sex crimes” exception to the general rule, but that it has recognized a narrow special rule which admits prior sex crimes into evidence if they are included in the indictment. Because the evidence of prior sex crimes admitted here was not included in the indictment and was wholly independent from the sex crime for which the defendant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PartonTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- State v. DolinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- State v. ThackerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RodriguezTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.