Legal Opinion

United States v. Cornell

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided December 21, 1940No. 2818, 2819PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

The two defendants were indicted in separate indictments which are identical and are based upon the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 301 et seq.

The indictment in each case charges the defendant with evading the requirement of the act in refusing to register in the land and naval forces of the United States at the time and in the manner prescribed in the act, and the rules and regulations made pursuant thereto.

Identical motions to quash the indictments were made in each case, and the primary ground thereof is that Congress had no power…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Kneedler v. LaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  4. United States v. SugarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
  5. United States v. OlsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Bertelsen v. CooneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. Donald Smeltz ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API