Legal Opinion

Bertelsen v. Cooney

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1954No. 14804_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a graduate medical doctor, when 33 years old was drafted into the United States Army in an enlisted status, in which he is now serving. He was offered a commission both before and after induction, but declined.

As petitioner below, he sought, but was refused, discharge by habeas corpus, claiming that Public Law 779, § 4(i) (2), 81st Congress, Second Session, 64 Stat. 826, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 454(i) (2), under which he was drafted, is invalid.

The Act, now an amendment of the Universal Military Training Act, authorizes the President, subject to certain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Michael Waldo Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. J. D. Williamson, Jr. v. Paul E. Vardeman, Judge of Jackson County, and Susan StantonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Barcelo v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
  4. United States v. Claud Michael KemberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. RichmondDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API