Legal Opinion

State v. Hendking

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1993No. 63749PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Nahra, Judge.

Appellant, C.L. Hendking, is appealing his conviction for receiving stolen property, a violation of R.C. 2913.51. Appellant contends his conviction was based on insufficient evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Lu Ann Wagner was at work in the Business and Administration Building at Cuyahoga Community College. Shortly after 1:30 p.m., she discovered her purse had been stolen from her desk. Wagner recovered her purse from the first floor men’s room, but her pager and wallet were missing.

In the basement garage of the same building, around 1:40 p.m., Patricia Long had her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Featzka v. Millcraft Paper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Montpelier Public Library v. Williams County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PherigoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API