Legal Opinion

Featzka v. Millcraft Paper Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1980No. 79-752PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.

The sole issue before this court is whether R. C. 4111.17(E) prohibits appellant’s recovery of sex-based wage differentials occurring more than one year prior to the initiation of her action. Basically, we must decide if, in enacting R. C. 4111.17, the General Assembly intended each day of unequal treatment to constitute a separate and severable violation or whether each day is to be considered a part of a continuous violation. In order to construe a statute we must of course determine the legislative intent. As this court stated in the first paragraph of the syllabus in Henry v. Central…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brooks v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Erin Dindinger, Lisa Loring, and Elizabeth Freund v. Allsteel, Inc. and Scott MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. Drake-Lassie v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cummings v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API