Legal Opinion
State Inc. v. Sumpter & Williams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 24, 1996No. CX-96-361PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Odell Sumpter challenges the denial of his motion to vacate a federal judgment, arguing that clerical errors in docketing the judgment in Hennepin County district court rendered the federal judgment void. We affirm.
FACTS
Pursuant to a March 22, 1989 federal district court order, judgment was entered in the amount of $234,220.87 in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) against appellant Odell Sumpter and Charles Williams jointly and severally, 1 for copartnership debts. A subsequent foreclosure sale produced a $170,000 credit against the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Concannon v. HamptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Miller v. Eloie Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Shine v. RubensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The CADLE CO. II, INC. v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Griffis v. LubanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. DasovichCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- BANK OF AMERICA v. DASOVICHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017