Legal Opinion
The CADLE CO. II, INC. v. Hubbard
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2010No. SD 30510PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.
The Cadle Company II, Inc. (Cadle) appeals from a judgment denying Cadle’s request to register a judgment pursuant to Rule 74.14. 1 The trial court dismissed the case with prejudice and entered judgment for defendants Raymond and Holly Hubbard (referred to collectively as Defendants and individually by their given names). The court decided that Cadle had not complied with the requirements of Rule 74.14. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
On June 4, 2009, Cadle filed a petition to register a foreign judgment. The petition alleged that Cadle had'…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Concannon v. HamptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Sparaco v. SparacoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lorenzini v. ShortMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Miller v. DeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Miller v. Eloie Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brossart v. JankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. DasovichCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- BANK OF AMERICA v. DASOVICHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- BERMAN, DELEVE, KUCHAN & CHAPMAN, LLC v. 417 RENTALS, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Smith v. DeLeonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.