Legal Opinion
Concannon v. Hampton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 12, 1978No. 49748PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
Plaintiff, Thomas A. Coneannon, as the holder of a Missouri judgment for $15,-000.00 against defendant Hampton, filed his judgment and affidavit in the district court of Oklahoma County pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act of 1964, 12 O.S.1971 §§ 719-727 (the act). Defendant filed his response in which he asserted improper notice under the act and unavoidable casualty and misfortune in being unable to be present in person at the Missouri trial. He later filed an answer and counterclaim alleging fraud perpetrated by plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rubbelke v. AebliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Producers Grain Corporation v. CarrollCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Brown v. StroeterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Sautbine v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Carlson v. Prestige Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Davidson v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Snyder v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Mike Smith Pontiac, GMC, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Data Management Systems, Inc. v. EDP CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.