Fisher v. Bolton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. Civil action for damages for seduction. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The plaintiff’s testimony tended to show: That in the latter part of the year 1901 she and the defendant became engaged to be married. That under cover of such engagement and by protestations of love the defendant first accomplished the plaintiff’s seduction in 1901, and that such relation continued and such acts were repeated many times up to October or November, 1906. That on or about such latter date the plaintiff determined to change her course and to reform, and that she did so reform and was guilty of no improper. conduct until June 23, 1907, upon which date the same illicit relations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stafford v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Smith v. MilburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Reed v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Gardner v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Lamb v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. McCoy Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Kralick v. ShuttleworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Handlon v. HenshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- White v. International Text Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.