Legal Opinion

Smith v. Compania Litografica De La Habana

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant each move for a direction of a verdict. They have stipulated that the motions may be decided with the same force and effect as if they had been disposed of on the trial. There are two causes of action. One for $80,000 damages for breach by the defendant of an alleged contract of employment and a second for commissions claimed to have been *510earned prior to the said breach and not paid by the defendant. The determination herein should be one that will conform to section 457-a of the Civil Practice Act (as added by Laws of 1921, chap. 372); that is, such a verdict…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Savage v. . O'NeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Hall v. CordellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Drake v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Stumpf v. HallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John P. Loebig v. George H. LarucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Larx Co. Inc. v. NicolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. GanserNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Smith v. De La HabanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Duval v. SkourasNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API