Manistee River Improvement Co. v. Sands
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
These cases all come up on the same question, — whether the statute allowing the State Board of Control to regulate, and the plaintiff to collect, tolls for floating logs through such portions of the Manistee river as plaintiff has cleared and improved so as to facilitate floatage, is valid. There is a further question as to tolls previous to February, 1879. The defendant’s brief gives no very tangible reason why these differ from the rest. We see nothing to authorize any inquiry behind the tolls claimed that has not been practically disposed of by our previous decisions.
The validity of this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Benjamin v. Manistee River Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railroad & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Manistee River Improvement Co. v. LamportMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Witke v. State Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953