Benjamin v. Manistee River Improvement Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Quo warranto.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The purpose of the information in this case is to test the right of the respondent to exercise the franchise of taking tolls from persons- using certain portions of the Manistee river in running, rafting or floating logs or timber down said river.
The information is general, and charges usurpation of the franchise in question. The respondent filed a plea setting up the following facts:
That the respondent is a corporation, organized under and in pursuance of an. act of the Legislature of the State, entitled “An act to authorize the formation of corporations for the purpose of improving the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Pound v. TurckSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wisconsin River Improvement Co. v. MansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Palmer v. Cuyahoga CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1843
- Columbus Ins. v. Peoria Bridge Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1853
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kinnie v. BareMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. Muncie Pulp Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Osborne v. Knife Falls Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State v. Bonelli Cattle CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Harmon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.