Legal Opinion
Industrial Highway Corp. v. Danielson
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 6, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-4367PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion by defendant Colonel R.M. Danielson, District Engi neer, New York District, United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Industrial Highway Corporation (“Industrial”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Industrial instituted this action to challenge the Corps’ decision not to issue a notice to proceed under Nationwide Permit 26, published at 33 C.F.R. § 330.5(a)(26). This motion requires resolution of a single legal issue: whether the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Richardson v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bragg v. RobertsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
- Ripplin Shoals Land Company, Llc v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1996
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Utah Council, Trout Unlimited v. United States Army Corp. of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.