Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Morris
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 15, 1973No. 72-603PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellees are illegitimate children on whose behalf a class action was commenced seeking to enjoin enforcement of § 203 (a) of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 623, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §403 (a), on the ground that the provision was unconstitutional under this Court’s decisions in Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U. S. 164 (1972), and Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U. S. 68 (1968). The District Court granted appellees’ request for declaratory and injunctive relief.
On the merits, this appeal involves the same issues that were raised in Davis v. Richardson, 342 F. Supp. 588 (Conn.), aff’d,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trackwell v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- V S Limited Partnership, an Arkansas Limited Partnership v. Department of Housing and Urban Development United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.