Legal Opinion

O.C.S., Inc. v. Pi Energy Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 6, 2000No. 01-98-01094-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

O.C.S., Inc., a/k/a Oilwell Control Services (OCS), and Steve Clark, appellants, challenge a judgment awarding $5,703,000, plus attorney’s fees and costs to appellee, Pi Energy Corporation (PI). OCS and Clark present six issues challenging the authority of the trial judge to enter the judgment, which they claim is void. We are asked to address whether a sitting, elected, “regular” judge, who was assigned to hear a motion to recuse the trial judge, is subject to peremptory objection under section 74.053(b) of the Government Code; whether an order issued in another…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re PerrittTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Flores v. BannerTexas Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc. v. Neinast, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Williams v. Chisolm, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Aderoneke Aderemi v. Massandra KV Vineyards Owner, LLC, Individually and as Succeddor in Interest to PAC Vineyards, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  4. Ceasar, Willie v. Rodriguez, Ericka A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc. v. Neinast, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API