Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc. v. Neinast
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAFT, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order certifying a class of plaintiffs, which class includes appellees, Russell Neinast, W.J. Bowen, Jr., and Villette Finke, under rule 42 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Tex. R. Civ. P. 42; Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 5.014(a)(3) (Vernon Supp. 2001). The trial court defined the class as(1) all persons and entities who own or owned royalty interests under leases located in the State of Texas (except for those in Crockett and Sutton counties as to claims accruing on or before March 31,1999),(2) where UPRC,1 UPOG,2 or UP…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Polaris Industries, Inc. v. McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Lyda Swinerton Builders, Inc. v. Cathay Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Philadelphia American Life Insurance Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Enron Oil & Gas Co. v. Joffrion, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Bowden, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.