Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. Commercial Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 13469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, will be referred to herein as the defendant, and defendant in error, plaintiff below, as the plaintiff.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the trial court,’ sustaining a motion for a new trial. The facts out of which the lawsuit grew are that sometime in 1920, the defendant, Henry S. Ahrens, negotiated a business transaction with the Pilot Motor Sales Company of Muskogee, in which he bought from the said company a Pilot automobile, and part of the purchase price being unpaid, a conditional sales contract was signed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. In re Van NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Papworth v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Neal Loan & Banking Co. v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commercial Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. AhrensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Crane v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Dudley v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Latimer v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Liberty Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API