Legal Opinion

In re Morisseau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department in 2005. She resides in West New York, New Jersey.

Petitioner charges respondent with having engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and reflecting *1322adversely on her fitness as an attorney, with having engaged in criminal conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and reflecting adversely on her fitness as an attorney, and failure to cooperate with petitioner (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [3], [5], [7] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (3), (5), (7)]).* The three charges…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MorisseauAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API