In re Morisseau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department in 2005. She resides in West New York, New Jersey.
Petitioner charges respondent with having engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and reflecting *1322adversely on her fitness as an attorney, with having engaged in criminal conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and reflecting adversely on her fitness as an attorney, and failure to cooperate with petitioner (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [3], [5], [7] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (3), (5), (7)]).* The three charges…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MorisseauAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014