Legal Opinion

People v. Morisseau

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 21, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*60OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, the accusatory instrument reinstated insofar as it charged two counts of disorderly conduct, and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

Initially, defendant was charged with obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (Penal Law § 195.05) and two counts of disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [2], [3]). At arraignment, the two counts of disorderly conduct were dismissed on the ground of facial insufficiency. Thereafter, defendant moved, inter alia, to dismiss the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. People v. RickertNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. BerrusNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. RessAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
  3. People v. Knight (Jacqueline)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API