Legal Opinion

Royal Baking Co. v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1938No. 27752PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

At the instance of the city of Oklahoma City the Royal Baking Company was enjoined from using a frame structure on its business premises for a garage or repair shop for its trucks. It was alleged, and the trial court found, that such use violated portions of city ordinance No. 2634, known as the general zoning ordinance.

This ordinance was passed in 1923. For several years prior thereto the baking company had been operating a commercial bakery upon lots 15 and 16, block 20, Maywood addition to Oklahoma City. More than five years before the passage of the ordinance it purchased adjoining lots…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Rotter v. Coconino CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Application of ShadidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Botchlett v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API