Legal Opinion

General Dynamics Corp. v. City of Groton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 23, 1981PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This litigation arises out of the request of the plaintiff, General Dynamics Corporation, that the defendant, the city of Groton, discontinue a portion of a public highway in Groton. The city of Groton agreed to the discontinuation, but a group of citizens, Betsy B. Gibson, Irene Garagliano, John Garagliano, Raymond Beaulieu and Timothy Giesling (hereinafter Gibson et al.) interposed timely objections, so that the trial court, Santaniello, J., appointed a committee, pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-50, to determine “the convenience or necessity” of the highway. The com mittee’s report in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  5. Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API