Legal Opinion

Latter v. Holsum Bread Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1945No. 6795PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Plaintiff, Fullmer H. Latter, the business representative of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 222, brings this action to recover pay for services rendered between January 1, 1942, and February 15, 1944, by four members of that union. The complaint is in four counts and plaintiff claims the money is owing under the terms of a contract, dated November 7, 1940, between the union and defendant governing the wage scale of the union members. Plaintiff’s assignors were driver salesmen. Three of them were in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson Et Ux. v. BrinkerhoffUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. McCullough v. Clinch-Mitchell Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Gates v. Arizona Brewing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Textile Workers Union v. American Thread Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
  2. Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. E. E. Tripp Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Jackson CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. UNITED ASS'N OF JOURN. & APP. OF PLUMBING, ETC. v. StineNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Barnhart v. Civil Service Employees Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API