Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 13, 1958No. 29Published

1DissentJustice Frankfurter

For losses alleged to have resulted from a wartime order of the War Production Board, various of the respondents sought monetary relief in the Court of Claims. These suits had a checkered career in that court, and, as a consequence, Congress passed remedial legislation that has served as a ground for respondents’ continued assertion of their right to recover. A consideration of the history of this controversy is necessary for due appreciation of this legislation, and an understanding of the legislation, its background and its meaning, is essential to a proper disposition of the suit before us.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Mille Lac Band of Chippewa Indians in Minn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Oro Fina Consolidated Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Hempstead Warehouse Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. United States v. CummingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Board of County Com'rs of Sedgwick County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API