DiStefano v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court which declares that the taxpayers, Kustom Katerers, Inc. (Kustom), and Joseph’s Industrial Catering Corp. (Joseph’s), are not subject to tax under G. L. c. 64H in the conduct of their industrial commissary operations. The judge ruled, after a hearing on the taxpayers’ motion for partial summary judgment, that “in the conduct of their industrial commissary operations [the taxpayers] do not operate ‘restaurants,’ do not sell ‘meals’ and therefore sales of food products by Kustom and Joseph’s are not subject…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Bolster v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Sydney v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Madden v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commissioner of Revenue v. AMIWoodbroke, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Luchini v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Horvitz v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Space Building Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.