Legal Opinion

Luchini v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 25, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

Charles and Billie K. Luchini (Luchinis) dispute their income tax bill, and claim that the lien recorded by the Department of Revenue (department) to recover the money is invalid because it attached to property that they did not own at the time the lien was created. Because we agree with the Superior Court judge’s conclusions that (1) the Luchinis waived their right to appeal the assessments’ validity by failing to exhaust their administrative remedies, and (2) tax liens may attach to after-acquired property, we affirm.

1. Facts. The Luchinis lived abroad from 1980 through 1988. Believing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Wynn & Wynn, P.C. v. Massachusetts Commission against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Markham, etc v. FayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Sydney v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. DiStefano v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Town Fair Tire Centers, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Lee v. International Data GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. Town of Hingham v. Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Horizon Bank and Trust Co. v. FlahertyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. Puorro v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API