Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
We consider whether it is lawful for the Commonwealth to calculate retaliatory taxes on insurance premiums of a foreign insurer separately for life insurance premiums and for premiums on all other lines of insurance. On the appeal of The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) from a ruling of the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner), the Appellate Tax Board (board) concluded that the separate treatment of Prudential’s life insurance premiums and health and accident premiums for retaliatory tax purposes was required by statute and did not violate the equal protection provisions…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickerson v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- First American Title Insurance Co. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
- Massachusetts Bay Lines, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.