Legal Opinion
Carvel v. Arents
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1954No. Civ. 20017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action seeking damages for alleged fraud in the sale of a parcel of real estate to her by Bess Tate Ayres. In addition to defendant Ayres several others alleged to have acted as brokers for the seller were named as defendants. In substance the alleged fraud consisted of representations that the property was worth much more than plaintiff paid for it, was actually worth considerably less and the further representation that it could be resold within a month at a profit to plaintiff. Defendants answered.
When the case came on for trial plaintiff was granted leave to file a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fisher v. EckertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Townsend v. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Amestoy Estate Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Riley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Menotti v. MarchesiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Building Co. v. City & Suburban Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ackerman v. AckermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Hehr v. SwendseidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Applegate v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957