Legal Opinion

State v. Stuart

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 7, 2009No. AC 27703PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The defendant, Mark T. Stuart, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of twenty-eight counts arising out of his involvement in a stolen car operation. Particularly, the convictions centered around his possession of three cars, a Lincoln Navigator (Navigator), a Cadillac Escalade (Escalade) and a Chevrolet Corvette (Corvette), which were stolen and had altered vehicle identification numbers (VINs). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the submission to the jury of certain exhibits that were not entered into evidence violated his right to an…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. KamelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. ZapataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Frank v. Department of Children & FamiliesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Connecticut v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API