Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Newhart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1929No. Appeal 244PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthbop, J.,

Appellant, under sentence for maintaining a bawdy house on premises Nos. 514 and 516 Pine Street, in the City of Easton, brings to us for consideration certain rulings of the trial judge which are said to be erroneous, and the constitutionality of the Act of June 30, 1923, P. L. 982.

The first ruling complained of is that the Commonwealth could ash certain of its witnesses these questions: “Who is reputed to be running those places?” and, “Who has the reputation of keeping 514 and 516 Pine Street?” Appellant’s contention is that these rulings were in violation of Section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ayars v. WestfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Commonwealth v. WinkelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Commonwealth v. MurrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Commonwealth v. CicconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. MuellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth. v. VisotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API