Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moore

Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided December 21, 1931No. 47Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fox, J.,

— We have before us a motion for a new trial based upon the following reasons:

“1. Because the verdict is against the evidence.
“2. Because the verdict is against the weight of the evidence.
“3. Because the honorable court erred in admitting certain testimony concerning the reputation of the house, No. 312 Mulberry Street, City of Harrisburg, County of Dauphin and State of Pennsylvania, without the proper foundation having been laid.
“4. Because the honorable court erred in admitting testimony concerning the reputation of the defendant without the proper foundation having been laid.”

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Commonwealth v. NewhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API