Legal Opinion

Joblon v. Solow

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1996No. 94 Civ. 0610 (RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge,

Defendants Sheldon H. Solow (“Solow”) and Avon Products, Inc. (“Avon”) have moved for an order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, granting summary judgment and dismissing the remaining claims brought against them by Plaintiffs Richard Joblon (“Joblon”) and Magdalena Joblon (collectively, the “Joblons”).

For the reasons set forth below, Solow’s motion will be granted and Avon’s motion will be denied.

The Parties and Prior Proceedings

The nature of the parties, prior proceedings, and facts underlying this action are set forth fully in the prior opinions of this Court,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Holt v. Welding Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Joblon v. SolowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Joblon v. SolowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Joblon v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API