Legal Opinion
Scarborough v. Clemco Industries
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided May 16, 2003No. Civ.A. 03-0087PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Barbara Scarborough and her two adult children, Rhonda Scarborough Halterlein and William Scarborough, Jr. (“Plaintiffs”) have filed this lawsuit individually and on behalf of the decedent, William Scarborough alleging causes of action under the Louisiana general tort law, survival and wrongful death actions pursuant to La.C.C. 2315.1 and 2815.2. Plaintiffs claim the decedent died as a result of the negligence of named defendants, Pulmosan Safety Equipment Company’s (“Pulmo-san”) and Clemco Industries (“Clemco”). Also, named as defendants…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scarborough v. Clemco IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- RICHARDSON v. BARBOURDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Shields v. Baker Hughes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004