Camili v. Penna. R.R. Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Argued April 17, 1939. Defendant employer has appealed from a judgment in favor of claimant entered in the court below, sustaining the award of the Workmen's Compensation Board. The questions raised on this appeal go not to the facts, for there is little dispute, but to the inferences to be drawn from them. From the record we find sufficient competent evidence to sustain the findings of the Board that on September 7, 1937, claimant sustained a hernia in the course of his employment and that the injury was the result of an accident.
Plaintiff's status was that of a machinist's helper but…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. YurkonisSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Landis v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Gammaitoni v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.