Legal Opinion

William Andrew Washington v. Donald Clemmer

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 11, 1964No. 18602PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam 1

This is a habeas corpus case challenging the lawfulness of the procedures used in a preliminary hearing. Appellant, an indigent juvenile, was charged with the capital offense of abetting a rape. After the juvenile court waived jurisdiction, he was brought before the United States Commissioner on May 7, 1964, 1 for a preliminary hearing to determine whether there was probable cause to believe that an offense had been committed and that the appellant had committed it. Rule 5(c), Fed.R.Crim.P. The Government’s only witness was a police officer of the Sex Squad who testified to the complainant’s…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2; Per curiam 3; Per curiam 4.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. George E. Ross, Jr. v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Frank A. Tate v. United States of America, Robert M. Edelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API