Legal Opinion

Day v. Day

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Police Court of Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

Decision of

Chief Justice Judd.

I find the following facts in this case:

Plaintiff and defendant are brothers. The plaintiff lived with his brother, the defendant, paying for his room and board. On the 9th April, 1891, the clothing and personal effects of plaintiff were destroyed by a fire which consumed the house and defendant’s effects as well. An infant child of defendant who had arrived at the age of two years the day before the fire, unable to speak intelligently, but capable of somewhat appreciating *716when corrected lor what she had done that was wrong or forbidden, was known bjr its parents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. GillettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  2. Tifft v. TifftNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Baxter v. BushSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
  4. Dyer v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  5. Vermont Academy of Medicine v. LandonNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seibel v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hudson v. Von HammCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Rathburn v. KaioHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bryan v. KitamuraDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1982
  5. Victoria ex rel. Pihaleo v. PalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API